Legal Opinion

Abramowicz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided January 24, 1977PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STIFTEL, President Judge.

Plaintiff filed a declaratory judgment action against her insurer to recover under the uninsured motorist provision of her automobile insurance policy. Defendant insurer denied coverage and filed this motion for summary judgment.

Plaintiff’s action results from injuries allegedly suffered by her when an' automobile she occupied as a passenger was forced off the roadway by an unidentified motor vehicle. As a result, the vehicle in which plaintiff rode struck several parked cars causing her injuries. Both parties agree there was no physical contact between the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brown v. Progressive Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Prosk v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  3. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. NovakWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Inter-Insurance Exchange of Automobile Club v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. DeMello v. First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  2. Clark v. Regent Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AbramowiczSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  5. O'Hanlon v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API