Thomas v. Solberg
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
In a partial settlement of a comparative fault case with two of three defendants, the plaintiff received $75,000. The jury ultimately found that the settling defendants were liable for less than this amount. In these circumstances does Iowa Code chapter 668 (1985) (comparative fault) permit the district court to apply, the pro tanto credit rule thereby allowing the nonsettling defendant the benefit of the favorable settlement? The district court did not think so, nor do we. We affirm.
I. On November 16, 1985, Cynthia Thomas, the plaintiff, was injured in a three-car…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
- Charles v. Giant Eagle MarketsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Kussman v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Doyle v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1977
- Greiner v. HicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Wells v. Tallahassee Mem. Med. CenterSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Krieser Ex Rel. Krieser v. HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Biddle v. Sartori Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Brown v. KassoufSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.