Legal Opinion
Litwin v. iRenew Bio Energy Solutions, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 2014No. B248759PublishedCited by 3 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHANEY, J. *
Plaintiffs filed class action lawsuits against iRenew Bio Energy Solutions, LLC, Harvest Trading Group, Inc., and Harvest Direct, LLC (collectively defendants), for advertising a bracelet made by iRenew as a revolutionary bracelet that uses the body’s “biofield” to improve strength and wellness. Alleging the advertising claims were false, plaintiffs sought injunctive relief and damages on behalf of all persons in the United States who purchased an iRenew bracelet. Defendants agreed to settle the lawsuit, and the trial court approved a settlement agreement in which…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Cho v. Seagate Technology Holdings, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- In Re Vitamin CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
3Cited by3 opinions
- Low v. Trump University, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Choi v. RestainoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Laffitte v. Robert Half Internat.California Court of Appeal · 2014