State v. Bridges
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the warrantless seizure of cocaine from the defendant’s person during a detention and frisk was constitutionally permissible under the “plain feel” or “plain touch” doctrine expounded in Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993). In this case, the trial court denied the defendant’s motion to suppress, and thereafter, the defendant pled guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to sell, but reserved the right to appeal the constitutionality of the warrantless seizure pursuant to Tenn. R.Crim. P. 37(b)(2).1…
3Cases cited43 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by190 opinions
- State v. BinetteTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CrutcherTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HicksTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
- Commonwealth v. ZhahirSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.