Legal Opinion
Bruce P. Paolini v. Albertson's Inc. Plan Administrator, of Albertson's Amended and Restated Stock-Based Incentive Plan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 10, 2005No. 03-35724PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ORDER CERTIFYING QUESTIONS OF LAW TO THE IDAHO SUPREME COURT
Bruce P. Paolini, the plaintiff, appeals the district court’s summary judgment decision. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants, Paolini’s former employer Albertson’s, Inc. and the Administrator of Albertson’s, Inc.’s Stock-Based Incentive Plan (the “Plan Administrator”), (collectively “Albertson’s”).
On appeal Paolini argues, among other things, that he was fired for petitioning to exercise stock options granted to him by Albertson’s. He argues that firing him for this reason violated Idaho’s wage laws and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mark Scully v. Us Wats, Inc. Kevin O'hare, Individually and in His Capacity as President of Us Wats Aaron Brown, Individually and in His Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Us Wats Stephen Parker, Individually and in His Capacity as Executive Vice-President of Us WatsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Falkowski v. Imation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Edmondson v. Shearer Lumber ProductsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Thomas v. Medical Center Physicians, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Watson v. Idaho Falls Consolidated Hospitals, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Paolini v. Albertson's Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Bruce P. Paolini v. Albertson's Inc. Plan Administrator, of Albertson's Amended and Restated Stock-Based Incentive PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Paolini v. Albertson's Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2006
- Paolini v. Albertson's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007