Paolini v. Albertson's Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
149 P.3d 822 (2006)
Bruce P. PAOLINI, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant-Appellant,
v.
ALBERTSON'S INC., Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellee-Respondent, and
Plan Administrator of Albertson's Amended and Restated Stock-Based Incentive Plan, Defendant-Appellee-Respondent.
No. 32495.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Moscow, August 2006 Term.
November 22, 2006.
Bruce P. Paolini, Virginia Beach, Virginia, appellant pro se.
Stoel Rives, LLP, Boise, for respondents. James Dale argued.
EISMANN, Justice.
We have accepted questions of law certified by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals asking us whether stock options constitute…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Edmondson v. Shearer Lumber ProductsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Thomas v. Medical Center Physicians, P.A.Idaho Supreme Court · 2002
- Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Polk v. LarrabeeIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Sorensen v. Comm Tek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.