Legal Opinion
Mardula v. Rancho Dominguez Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 15, 1996No. B085724PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN (Brett), J.*
John J. Mardula, Jr., appeals from an order of dismissal, entered after a demurrer was sustained, without leave to amend, to both claims pleaded in his complaint against respondents Rancho Dominguez Bank and Daniel Roberts. The appeal presents a question not yet decided by a California or federal court: whether section 8 of the National Bank Act (12 U.S.C. § 24), which provides that all officers of a national bank serve at the pleasure of its board of directors, precludes enforcement of a bank’s written agreement that its president will receive severance pay if…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Marvin MacKey Lillian MacKey Husband and Wife v. Pioneer National Bank, a National Banking Corporation Paul Campbell, Marie Campbell, Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Freeman & Mills, Inc. v. Belcher Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Westervelt v. MohrenstecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Aalgaard v. Merchants National Bank, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Kerndt v. Rolling Hills National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Marques v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Doe v. ABC Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Peatros v. BANK OF AMERICA NT & SACalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.