Legal Opinion
Roska Ex Rel. Roska v. Peterson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 5, 2002No. 01-4057PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs brought this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging deprivations of various Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The district court found that defendants were entitled to qualified immunity and dismissed the suit. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and AFFIRM in part, REVERSE in part, and REMAND for further proceedings.
I. Background
On May 20, 1999, Connie Roska (“Mrs.Roska”) dropped off her 12-year-old son, Rusty Roska (“Rusty”), at school. He was wearing a parka even though it was 70 degrees outside. Patricia Maynor, a school nurse, noticed…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Doe v. HeckCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Gomes v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Braam v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Braam Ex Rel. Braam v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- John Doe, Jane Doe v. Kathleen A. KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.