Legal Opinion
John Doe, Jane Doe v. Kathleen A. Kearney
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 8, 2003No. 02-13874PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACK, Circuit Judge:
Appellants John Doe and Jane Doe, 1 individually and on behalf of their three minor children, D.M., N.O., and B.O., appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action against Appellee Deborah O’Brien. 2 Their claims arise out of an incident in which O’Brien, an authorized agent of the Florida Department of Children and Family Services (DCF), effected an “emergency” removal of Appellants’ children without Appellants’ permission and without a court order. Appellants brought this action seeking a declaration that Fla. Stat. § 39.401(1), which purportedly authorized the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Gates v. Texas Deparment of Protective & Regulatory ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Nicole Maddox v. Babette StephensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- Dennis Reeves Cooper v. Gordon A. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Roy Padgett v. James E. DonaldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Gomes v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.