Legal Opinion

Mahoney

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 13, 1979No. 497-77PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This tax refund case is before the court on plaintiffs request, pursuant to Rule 53(c)(2)(ii), for review of the trial judge’s December 26, 1978, order allowing defendant leave to file a first amended answer. For reasons which follow, the request is denied.

At issue in this case is plaintiffs claim for an income tax refund of $39,508, plus interest assessed as a deficiency against and paid by plaintiff for his 1971 taxable year. Defendant’s original answer to the pleadings, filed approximately 1 year ago, raised no setoff defenses. However, after conducting substantial discovery, defendant, on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samuel C. Dysart and Alma R. Dysart v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. DeLong Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  2. Inforex, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. C.P. Squire Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API