Legal Opinion

C.P. Squire Contractors, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 10, 1982No. 457-77Published

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff requests review of Trial Judge George Willi’s order of June 10, 1982. Although not explicitly stated in plaintiffs brief, we deem it to be a motion for interlocutory review under Rule 53(c)(2) of this court. Trial Judge Willi issued the order pursuant to the authority granted to him under Rule 13 of this court. Since Trial Judge Willi has not certified the order pursuant to Rule 53(c)(2)(i), plaintiffs request must, therefore, be within Rule 53(c)(2)(ii).

The rules of this court establish a strict standard for interlocutory review. Mahoney v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 624 (1979);…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. C.P. Squire Contractors, Inc. v. The United States of America v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  2. C.P. Squire Contractors, Inc.United States Court of Claims · 1980
  3. C.P. Squire Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. MahoneyUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Contemporary Mission, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API