Legal Opinion

Samuel C. Dysart and Alma R. Dysart v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 22, 1965No. 61-63PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

This is a suit for the refund of $4,-548.48 collected as a penalty for the year 1954 for an underestimation of income-. *626tax. The government, although it concedes that the imposition of the penalty was erroneous, nevertheless was denied taxpayers’ claim for refund since it has asserted an offset exceeding, the .amount sought due to an alleged income tax deficiency for the year 1954. The .taxpayers, by this motion for summary judgment, seek to strike the government’s setoff. It is also admitted that the statute of limitations bars the Commissioner of Internal Revenue from making…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Commissioner v. AckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Estate of Mueller v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  4. Thomas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API