Legal Opinion

Eubanks v. . Becton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action by the plaintiff as mortgagor, for an accounting and to redeem. The issues raised by the pleadings were by consent referred to Hon. F. A. Daniels, and the following facts are found by him, to which no exception is taken:

On 3 April, 1900, the defendant, Amos F. Becton, conveyed to the plaintiff, E. E. Eubanks, the tract of land described in the complaint, for the consideration of $1,000.

On the same day the plaintiff and his wife executed and delivered to said Becton their ten bonds for the purchase money, in different amounts and payable 1 January, 1901, and annually…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pence v. LangdonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Moore v. DickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Shillaber v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Crinkley v. EgertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  5. Chace v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ricks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  2. Mitchell v. . ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Jessup v. NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Jessup v. . NixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API