Montgomery v. Trisler

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Almost seventeen years and three appeals later, this case is before us once again. Most recently, in Montgomery v. Trisler, 77l N.E.2d 1234 (Ind.Ct.App.2002) (T'rister III), we held that appellant-defendant Robert Montgomery was liable for the payment of attorney's fees to the ap-pellee-plaintiff, G. Raymond Trisler, for pursuing a frivolous and meritless appeal with respect to the amount and nature of damages that had been previously awarded. Hence, we remanded the cause to the trial court for a calculation of appellate attorney's fees and damages owed. Id. at 1239.

The…