Legal Opinion
Smith v. Lake County
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 2007No. 45A03-0609-CV-430PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRONE, Judge.
Case Summary
Herbert Smith appeals the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of defendants Lake County (“the County”) and clerk of the Lake Superior Court (“the Clerk”) on the basis that Smith’s claim regarding the enforcement of Indiana Code Section 35-33-8.5-4 is barred by res judicata. The County, the Clerk, and in-tervenor Criminal Justice Section of the Lake County Bar Association (“the LCBA”) (collectively, “Appellees”) request sanctions against Smith, characterizing this litigation as “frivolous, unreasonable or groundless.” Appellees’ Br. at 19. We affirm…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Herbert Smith v. City of Hammond, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Hammond Pure Ice & Coal Co. v. HeitmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Lake County Clerk's Office v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Bank One Trust No. 386 v. Zem, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Smith v. City of HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Finke v. Northern Indiana Public Service Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Antwoin Richmond v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- In the Matter of Custody of: L.T. and A.B., minor children, R.L. and P.L. v. A.B. and R.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Jack L. Yant, III v. Barry L. Payne (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015