Legal Opinion
Parks v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 2003No. 77A01-0207-CV-266PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
In an action too obtuse to be summarized here in one or two sentences, veteran pro se litigant Timothy Parks appeals a ruling dismissing his claim against multiple defendants, presenting the following restated issues for review:
1. Did the trial court err in denying Parks's request for pauper counsel?
2. Did the trial court err in denying Parks permission to proceed on the amended complaint?
3. Did the trial court err in dismissing Parks's case as frivolous?
4. Did the trial court err in denying Parks's motion for partial summary judgment?
We affirm.
The facts are that on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Frieda MASON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NATIONAL BANK and Ronald Friedman, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Allen v. Great American Reserve Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Alphonso Singleton v. Lee Edward Smith and Eric RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Parks v. Madison CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene HarperIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Williams v. Cingular WirelessIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Higgason v. StogsdillIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Murphy v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Higgason v. LemmonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.