Legal Opinion

Hannah v. Hannah

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1936No. 3167PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, C. J.:

This is a motion for an order requiring the respondent to pay to the clerk of this court, or to the clerk of the court below, several sums totaling the amount of $400, to pay appellant’s costs for prosecuting her appeal.

Respondent did not contest the motion and made no appearance at the hearing notwithstanding notice thereof was duly served.

It appears from the affidavit of counsel for appellant in support of the motion that an appeal was ^ duly perfected from a decree of divorce awarded appellant’s husband, and from an order denying her motion for a new…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lamb v. LambNevada Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. CunninghamNevada Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Caye v. CayeNevada Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Levinson v. LevinsonNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Cunningham v. CunninghamNevada Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API