Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1940No. 3307Published

1Opinion

ON SECOND MOTION FOR ALLOWANCES AND MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

August 28, 1940. 105 P.2d 398. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

OPINION

The motion for allowances herein was denied without prejudice to appellant's filing, serving and presenting another motion therefor within a reasonable time. Ruling on the motion to dismiss the appeal was reserved until after the expiration of that time. Sylvia H. Cunningham v. Francis J. Cunningham, 60 Nev. 191,102 P.2d 94.

The motion for allowances was denied for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reynes v. DumontSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Embry v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Lake v. BenderNevada Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Lake v. LakeNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Black v. BlackMontana Supreme Court · 1905

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API