Legal Opinion

Andersen v. Schmidt

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1969No. Docket 5,188PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

A predecessor in title of the present defendants executed in favor of a predecessor of the present plaintiffs an agreement in words as follows:

“For and in consideration of $25 to me in hand paid by H. S. Clark of Traverse City, Michigan, I, the undersigned Henry Sackett of Blair Township, Grand Traverse County and State of Michigan, do hereby grant to H. S. Clark his heirs and assigns the right and privilege of ingress and egress over my land to his boat house on the shore of Silver lake, said land is described as follows:
“Lot 4 section 6, Township 26 North, Range 11 West.”

The 1924 agreement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hasselbring v. KoepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Waubun Beach Ass'n v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Tillman v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Day v. WaldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ludington & Northern Railway v. Epworth AssemblyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. City of Boyne City v. CrainMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API