Legal Opinion

Wolinsky v. National Casualty Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1931No. 22636PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Two questions of fact are presented upon this record, both of which by the general verdict of the jury were determined in favor of the in: sured: (1) Was there a compliance upon the part of the insured with the condition of the policy requiring books and accounts to be kept by the assured, so that the company could determine the amount of the loss? (2) Did the assured furnish proof of loss within the time stipulated in the policy? Upon the first issue there was ample evidence sustaining the claim of the assured that such a book of account, containing an inventory of the stolen jewelry, was…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Friendly Farms v. Reliance Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Russell Gasket Company v. The Phoenix of Hartford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. McCarty v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Commodore International, Ltd. v. National Union Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. KennyOhio Court of Appeals · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API