Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Kenny

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHERICK, PJ.

The result of the controversy was a judgment in favor of the receiver, from which judgment the indemnity company prosecutes error to this court, the chief grounds of error being: First, that the court below improperly overruled the motions of the indemnity company for a directed verdict; second, that it permitted evidence of waiver of conditions precedent to go to the jury when performance was pleaded and waiver was not pleaded; and, third, that the court erred in its general charge when instructing the jury concerning waiver. Decision of these claimed errors is dispositive of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fitchburg Savings Bank v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Ohio Export Trading Co. v. Natl. SuretyOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wolinsky v. National Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Edmunds-Bouvier Savings & Loan Ass'n v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API