Legal Opinion
Matheis v. CSL Plasma, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 27, 2018No. Civil No. 1:17-cv-00785PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYLVIA H. RAMBO, United States District Judge
This case under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. , presents an issue of first impression within the Third Circuit: whether a blood plasma donation center meets the definition of a "public accommodation" under the ADA. Plaintiff George Matheis, Jr. brings this action, alleging that Defendant CSL Plasma Inc.1 ("CSL") unlawfully discriminated against him due to his disability. Presently before the court is Defendant's motion for summary judgment. (Doc. 26.) For the reasons that follow, the court will grant…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- George Matheis, Jr. v. CSL Plasma IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Bell, Reginald v. Target Gas Station, LLCDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2019