Legal Opinion

State v. Andersen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2018No. Docket 45042PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

The State of Idaho appeals from the decision of the district court granting Brianna Nicole Andersen's motion to suppress statements that she made to a police officer. The district court granted Andersen's motion based on its finding that Andersen's statements were made without Miranda warnings during a custodial interrogation and that Andersen's statements were not voluntary. We reverse.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

At approximately midnight on October 1, 2016, Coeur d'Alene police officers responded to an apartment after receiving a 911 call from Andersen reporting that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. Godwin, Sr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State v. HollistIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. MaahsIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State v. Roman-LopezIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Hall v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API