Legal Opinion

May v. Caruso

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 13, 2002No. Record 012560PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Koontz

In this appeal, we consider whether the trial court erred in excluding certain evidence proffered by the plaintiff in a medical malpractice action. The trial court ruled that the plaintiff had not satisfied the requirements of the hearsay exception for statements published in authoritative treatises and articles contained in Code § 8.01-401.1 and, thus, prohibited the introduction into evidence of statements contained in certain published medical literature relied upon by the plaintiff’s expert witness. The trial court also excluded certain medical treatment records proffered by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Philip Morris, Inc. v. EmersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  2. John v. Wong Shik ImSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. McMunn v. TatumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Harrison v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. Weinberg v. GivenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wright v. KayeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  2. Rose v. JaquesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
  3. Beverly Dandridge Sprouse v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  4. Hinkley v. KoehlerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  5. Barkley v. WallaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API