Beverly Dandridge Sprouse v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
HUMPHREYS, Judge.
Beverly Dandridge Sprouse (“Sprouse”) appeals his conviction for driving under the influence, his third within ten years, in violation of Code § 18.2-266. On appeal, Sprouse contends that, because he was not arrested within three hours of the offense, the certificate of analysis used to convict him was not admissible pursuant to Virginia’s implied consent law. Sprouse further contends that, absent the certificate of analysis, the evidence is insufficient to prove that he drove under the influence of alcohol. For the reasons that follow, we agree with Sprouse’s first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Coe v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Overbee v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Simon v. ForerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Crawford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Wilder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Watts v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Lunsford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
- Rushing v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.