Legal Opinion

Miller v. Metzinger

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1979No. Civ. 53649PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POTTER, J.

Plaintiffs Margaret Miller (hereinafter Miller) and her adult children (Lariy, Michael and Karen Miller) appeal from a summary judgment in favor of defendants Lewis Metzinger (hereinafter Metzinger) and Sepulveda & Metzinger, a professional corporation, in plaintiffs’ suit for attorney malpractice.

A prior action for wrongful death (medical malpractice against two doctors and a hospital) brought by plaintiffs as heirs of Jack Miller was decided in favor of the defendants therein after a bifurcated trial of the defense of statute of limitations (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.5). Jack…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Central Cab Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  2. Tormo v. YormarkDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
  3. Barnes v. Blue Haven PoolsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. Carr EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Perkins v. West Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Fox v. PollackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Beery v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API