People v. Vasquez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court properly assessed 30 points under risk factor 9 based upon his prior youthful offender adjudication for burglary in the second degree (see Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary, at 13 [2006]; People v Stacconi, 81 AD3d 1046 [2011]; People v Thomas, 59 AD3d 783, 784 [2009]; People v Baker, 57 AD3d 1472, 1473 [2008]; People v Swackhammer, 25 AD3d 892 [2006]). To the extent that the defendant maintains that the Supreme Court failed to set forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which it…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. WyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HeichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. BristerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. AndrewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. FrancisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. PellisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.