Legal Opinion
Petro-Hunt L.L.C. v. United States
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided December 18, 2001No. Civ.A.00-0303PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM RULING
WALTER, District Judge.
Before this Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 85] and a Reply to Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 142], filed on behalf of the Plaintiff, Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., Hunt Petroleum Corporation, and Kingfisher Resources, Inc. (Petro-Hunt), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Defendants, United States of America, et al., oppose the Motion [Doe. 133]. 1 For the reasons assigned herein, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs, Petro-Hunt, L.L.C., Hunt Petroleum Corporation and Kingfisher Resources,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016