Legal Opinion

Monroe v. U.S. Marshals

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 15, 1996No. 95-35716UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

101 F.3d 706

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Sue MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

U.S. MARSHALS; U.S. Department of Justice; George Burke,

individually and jointly in his official capacity,

Defendants,

and

Judy Smith, Registered Nurse in her Official Capacity; City

of Kent; United States of America; Nancy Lederwood Van

Vleek, Physician's Assistant; Dennis Bylerly, individually

and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Logue v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Everest and Jennings, Inc. v. American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tubbs v. Sacramento County JailDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2009
  2. Kwesi Muhammad v. Marisol Hernandez, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API