Legal Opinion

S. & G. Gump Co. v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1941No. S. F. 15997PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

In 1936, the appellant paid under protest taxes upon personal property which was held by it on consignment and subsequently sued to recover the amount of such payment. There is no dispute concerning the facts and the judgment in favor of the respondent is based upon a construction of the applicable statutes.

At the time the assessment was made, the appellant was a dealer in art goods and merchandise and had in its possession certain goods entrusted to it for sale. It filed with the assessor of the City and County of San Francisco a statement or declaration of taxable personal property owned by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. RCA Photophone Inc. v. HuffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  2. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  3. S. W. Straus & Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Thompson v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sherman v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. County of Sacramento v. Assessment Appeals Board No. 2California Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. General Dynamics Corp. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. City of Desert Hot Springs v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Valley Fair Fashions, Inc. v. Valley FairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API