Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Maggio

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1928No. Docket No. 1596PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The appellant was charged by information, and found guilty by a jury, of having, on or about August 23, 1927, violated section 367e of the Penal Code, which said section provides in part that:

“Whenever an automobile, . . . strikes any person, or collides with any vehicle containing a person, the driver of, and all persons in, such automobile, . . . who have or assume authority over such driver, shall immediately cause such automobile ... to stop, and shall render to the person struck, or to the occupants of the vehicle collided with, all necessary assistance including the carrying of such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. Wong LoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. People v. CanfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People v. FoderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. HolfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. OdomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  3. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. State v. ParishIdaho Supreme Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API