Menzel v. Hinton.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Action by P. T. Menzel and others against C. E. & W. E. Plinton beard by Judge M. H. Justice, at December (Special) Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of Camden County. From a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
The Code, Sea 152(3) provides that the period prescribed for the commencement of “an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage or deed of trust for creditors with a power of sale of real property, where the mortgagor or grantor has been in possession of the property, within ten years after the forfeiture of the mortgage, or after the power of sale becomes absolute, or within ten years after the last payment on the same.” We are unable to discover in this *661language any period of time fixed within which the mortgagee is required to execute the power of sale. It will be observed that this section…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McCulloch v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Commonwealth v. BuccieriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Fievel v. ZuberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
- Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1885
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.