Legal Opinion

Goldfrank, Frank & Co. v. Young

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1885No. Case No. 5151PublishedCited by 69 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before the Hon. Geo. II. Noonan.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

The appellee, on the 27th day of February, 1882, sued out a writ of injunction to restrain the sale of certain real estate described in his petition, under a deed of trust with power of sale, which he had executed to A. M. Cohen, as trustee, to secure a note given by the appellee to Goldfrank, Frank & Co., of date February 12, 1877, payable twelve months after its date, for $6,000, and bearing interest from date, payable semi-annually, at the rate of twelve per cent, per annum.

There was no pretense in the petition that the note had been paid, and the sole ground on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Duty v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Grant v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hemphill v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Perkins v. SterneTexas Supreme Court · 1859

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Sam Bassett Lumber Co. v. City of HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Cathey v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Hall v. EdwardsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1920
  4. Stone v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. House v. . CarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API