Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Modern Engineering, Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 13, 2002No. Docket 228152PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilder, J.
Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary disposition in this claim under the Whistle-blowers’ Protection Act (wpa), MCL 15.361 et seq. We affirm.
1. FACTS and proceedings
Plaintiff was employed by defendant Modem Engineering, Inc. Under a contract between Modem Engineering and defendant DaimlerChrysler (then Chrysler), plaintiff worked at the Chrysler Jeep Truck Engineering Plant as a wood model maker. Although plaintiff was hired as a wood model maker, at the time he was fired only about five percent of his time was devoted to model making…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sandra J. Walton v. Mental Health Association of Southeastern PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Michael Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Conner v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Hazle v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Clyde Pugh v. City of Attica, Indiana, Attica Police Department, Attica Board of WorksCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
- BBF Engineering Services, PC v. State of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Derderian v. Genesys Health Care SystemsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Rymal v. BaergenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Shaw v. City of EcorseMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.