Legal Opinion

Shaw v. City of Ecorse

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 2009No. Docket 279997 and 280693PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

These consolidated appeals arise out of plaintiffs’ claims of adverse employment actions. In Docket No. 279997, plaintiff John Bedo appeals by leave granted the trial court order granting defendant, city of Ecorse, summary disposition with regard to his claim under the Whistleblowers’ Frotection Act (WFA), MCL 15.361 et seq. In Docket No. 280693, defendant appeals as of right the jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Robert Shaw on his claims of age discrimination and breach of contract and the trial court’s order denying its motion for a new trial or remittitur. In Docket No. 279997, we reverse…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Klapp v. United Insurance Group Agency, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Craig v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Eric Kuhn v. Washtenaw CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  2. Landin v. Healthsource Saginaw, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Anzaldua v. Neogen Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Taylor v. Kent Radiology, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Truel v. City of DearbornMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API