Legal Opinion

Manley ex rel. Manley v. Parker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 6, 1996No. COA95-217Published

1Opinion of the Court

McGEE, Judge.

The determining issue on appeal is whether plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to overcome defendants’ motion for a directed *542verdict. After reviewing the record and transcript, we hold that he did not and affirm the order of the trial court.

The well-settled rule in this state is that a driver who otherwise exercises reasonable care has no duty to foresee the sudden appearance of a child who darts out into a street. Koonce v. May, 59 N.C. App. 633, 635-36, 298 S.E.2d 69, 72 (1982). “[T]he rule is that the driver is not the insurer of the safety of children in the street, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Daniels Ex Rel. Goodson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Phillips ex rel. Schultz v. HollandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API