Legal Opinion

Adams v. Stealthbits Technologies Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 3, 2022No. 2:19-cv-04970Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HOLLY V. ADAMS, Case No. 2:19-CV-4970 Plaintiff, v. Judge Graham STEALTHBITS TECHNOLOGIES, Magistrate Judge Jolson INC., Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Holly Adams brings this action asserting violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 12112

to 12117; common law violations of Ohio public policy; and breach of contract. She alleges that defendant Stealthbits Technologies, Inc. (“Stealthbits”) discriminated against her because she has Major Depression. Stealthbits…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API