State v. Puente
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
By disqualifying people from jury service, based upon their professions, the jury commissioner did not specifically follow R. C. 2313.01 et seq. While R. C. 2313.12 authorizes commissioners of juries to exempt those who are statutorily entitled to exemption, a commissioner may do so only upon the request of the persons so entitled. Here, the commissioner would not place the names of those entitled to exemption in the jury wheel. Additionally, the commissioner compounded this shortcoming by not keeping a record of all proceedings before him, as required by R. C. 2313.12.
However, the failure…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hernandez v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Carter v. Jury Comm'n of Greene Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. DavieOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. EsparzaOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FultonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.