Legal Opinion

State v. Fulton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1991No. 90-359PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

In his three propositions of law, appellant claims that the Holmes County Jury Commissioners systematically excluded potential grand jurors and petit jurors from the jury array on the basis of their Amish religious beliefs, thereby depriving appellant of his rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and under R.C. Chapter 2313. For the reasons which follow, we find appellant’s arguments lack merit.

As a threshold to our inquiry we shall set forth the constitutional distinctions which have been recognized when examining the grand jury versus the petit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. HerringOhio Supreme Court · 2002

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API