Legal Opinion

Heideman v. Wirsing

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided June 23, 1992No. 91-C-370-CPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

CRABB, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff and defendants have filed objections to the Report and Recommendation entered herein by the United States Magistrate Judge on May 29, 1992. The magistrate judge recommended granting the defendants’ motion for summary judgment with respect to certain claims raised by plaintiff and denying it with respect to others.

Plaintiffs objection is addressed to the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant defendants’ motion with respect to plaintiffs claim that he was fired from his job as a deputy sheriff for political activity and expression in violation…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jeffrey L. Heideman v. Wayne Wirsing and Price County, WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Jessamy v. City of New Rochelle, New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  3. Love v. BolingerDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1996
  4. Chaney v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  5. Van Loo v. BraunDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API