Legal Opinion
Van Loo v. Braun
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided September 5, 1996No. 95-C-367PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
WARREN, District Judge.
Before the Court are two Motions for Summary Judgment filed separately by defendant Richard HorzewsM and defendant Steven Braun. For the reasons that follow, the Court concludes that HorzewsM and Braun are entitled to dismissal from suit for plaintiff’s failure to raise a successful cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and under the doctrine of qualified immunity. Therefore, the Court GRANTS both defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment.
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND AND FINDINGS OF FACT
The plaintiff, Cheryl Van Loo, a resident of Markesan, Wisconsin, was…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gerhardt v. MaresDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2016