Legal Opinion
D & a DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Butler
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 6, 1984No. C0-83-1504PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
D & A Development Company (D & A) appeals from a summary judgment that dismissed its malpractice action against Butler and Carlson for failure to state a cause of action. D & A contends on appeal that Butler and Carlson are liable in negligence for failing to complete architectural plans on time. We affirm.
FACTS
D & A employed Walter Butler Company (WBC), a professional corporation, to design and build a warehouse. Walter Butler signed the contract as president of WBC. It contained a schedule for completing the plans within three and one-half months. WBC hired Carlson, an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Minneapolis Society of Fine Arts v. Parker-Klein Associates Architects, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Bethesda Lutheran Church v. Twin City Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Keiper v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Coastal Conduit & Ditching, Inc. v. Noram Energy Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- United States v. James Burton Johnson, James Burton Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Glorvigen v. Cirrus Design Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Waldor Pump & Equipment Co. v. Orr-Schelen-Mayeron & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Major Tool & Machine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.