Legal Opinion

Updegraff v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 6, 1932No. L-421PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLittletoN, Judge

Plaintiff sues to recover increased subsistence and rental allowances of sixty cents a day and twenty dollars a month, respectively, under sections 5 and 6 of the act of June 10, 1922, 42 Stat. 628, as amended by the act of May 31, 1924, 43 Stat. 250, on the ground that from and after July 3, 1925, his mother was in fact dependent upon him for her chief support within the meaning of section 4 of the act of June 10, 1922, supra.

The position of the defendant is, first, that the evidence does not satisfactorily show the amount of the mother’s living expenses and, therefore, chief dependency has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  2. Freeland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
  3. Haas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
  4. Bradley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ficklen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API