Legal Opinion

Miller v. Duhart

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 1, 1982No. 44471PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Judge.

This is an action in which the plaintiffs seek damages for the “wrongful life” or “wrongful birth” of a child born after the allegedly negligent performance of a bilateral tubal ligation. The Circuit Court of St. Louis County sustained the defendants’ motion to dismiss, ruling that the action was barred by the two-year statute of limitations, § 516.105 R.S.Mo.1978. 1 The plaintiffs appealed. The judgment is affirmed.

Appellant Virginia Miller, upon the birth of her fourth child, decided she wanted no more children. Respondents Alan S. Palmer, D.O. and Fred DuHart, D.O. were…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  3. Wilkinson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  4. Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Siemieniec v. Lutheran General HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. James G. v. CasertaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Weiss v. RojanasathitSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  5. Lough Ex Rel. Lough v. Rolla Women's Clinic, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API