Legal Opinion

General Baking Co. v. Soles

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided June 7, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor:

In the present showing it cannot be, and is not in fact, seriously questioned that the defendant is engaged in the business of selling bakery products for himself as proprietor of the business. He buys his supplies from Dalton’s Bakery which is in the wholesale as well as retail business. What he buys from Dalton’s Bakery he pays for, and if he should fail to market all his purchases, the loss is his. He is not an agent for Dalton’s Bakery, nor in any sense an employee for that concern.

The question then is whether the act of the defendant *345in going in business for himself and in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright v. ScottonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
  2. Tarr v. StearmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Scotton v. WrightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
  4. Owl Laundry Co. v. BanksNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
  5. Counts v. MedleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adams v. AdamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Capital Bakers, Inc. v. LeahyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1935
  3. Turek v. TullCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  4. Turek v. TullCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1958
  5. Original Vincent & Joseph, Inc. v. SchiavoneCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API