Legal Opinion

(PC) Harrison v. Office of the San Joaquin County District Attorney

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 20, 2022No. 2:22-cv-01080Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WANDA MAE HARRISON, No. 2:22-cv-1080 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983, and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. 19 This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API