Legal Opinion
Borenstein v. The Animal Foundation
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 22, 2024No. 2:19-cv-00985Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Brian Borenstein, Case No. 2:19-cv-00985-CDS-NJK 5 Plaintiff Order Resolving the Parties’ Various Motions to Seal Relating to Defendants’ 6 v. Motions for Summary Judgment 7 The Animal Foundation, et al., [ECF Nos. 429, 432, 433, 438, 447] 8 Defendants 9 10 Before the court are (1) defendant Clark County’s motion for leave to redact portions of 11 their motion for summary judgment and to file certain exhibits under seal (ECF No. 429), (2) 12 defendant The Animal Foundation’s (“TAF”) motion for leave to file under seal its motion for 13…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ready Transportation, Inc. v. AAR Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.