State v. Dubs
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
YANDE WALLE, Justice.
Michael David Dubs appealed from a judgment of conviction of the Cass County district court for robbery, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We affirm.
When a defendant alleges on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction, “ ‘we do not weigh conflicting evidence, nor do we judge the credibility of witnesses; instead, we look only to the evidence most favorable to the verdict and the reasonable inferences therefrom to see if there is substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.’ ” State v. Mertz, 362 N.W.2d 410, 414…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. OhnstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Zander v. S.J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. MorstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Gussiaas v. NeustelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. DubsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986