Legal Opinion

State v. Dubs

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1986No. Cr. 1148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YANDE WALLE, Justice.

Michael David Dubs appealed from a judgment of conviction of the Cass County district court for robbery, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction. We affirm.

When a defendant alleges on appeal that the evidence is insufficient to sustain a conviction, “ ‘we do not weigh conflicting evidence, nor do we judge the credibility of witnesses; instead, we look only to the evidence most favorable to the verdict and the reasonable inferences therefrom to see if there is substantial evidence to warrant a conviction.’ ” State v. Mertz, 362 N.W.2d 410, 414…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. MertzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. OhnstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Zander v. S.J.K.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. MorstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gussiaas v. NeustelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. WalkerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. DubsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API