State v. Morstad
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Thomas J. Morstad appeals from a judgment of conviction of gross sexual imposition. He contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the court’s verdict. We affirm.
In a criminal trial to a court without a jury, like this one, our standard of review is the same as if the case had been tried to a jury. State v. Johnson, 425 N.W.2d 903 (N.D.1988). We announced the standard of review which guides our disposition of this case in State v. Schill, 406 N.W.2d 660, 661 (N.D.1987), saying:
“In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to convict, we look only to the evidence most…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Livingood v. MeeceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. JandaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Olmstead v. First Interstate Bank of Fargo, N.A.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. SchillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. PaulNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- McNamara v. Director of North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. VanceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. GefrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Morstad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.