Legal Opinion

State v. Walker

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 2010No. 20100112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Michael Walker appeals after a jury found him guilty of robbery. The State cross-appeals the district court’s conclusion that Walker’s actions do not fit the requirements under the mandatory minimum sentencing statute. We affirm the criminal judgment and hold the State’s cross-appeal is not authorized.

I

[¶ 2] Daniella Thompson was employed by Minot Junior Golf as the site manager for its charitable gaming operation at the Hooterville Bar in Ruthville, North Dakota. One of the employees she supervised was Dillon Ouellette. At the end of the night of May 1, 2009,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Investors Title Insurance Co. v. HerzigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. NaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. United States v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hollingsworth v. HollingsworthNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GoodaleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. State v. SwearingenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. Goodale 2024 ND 120North Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API